Post by juthi52943 on Jan 4, 2024 1:16:12 GMT -3
In the response of August , , the Company again apologized for exposing the plaintiff BN to inconvenience related to the breach of the plaintiffs personal data. The Company indicated that it makes every effort to remove all effects of this violation and informed that the contractor to whom the Plaintiffs personal data was sent by mistake received a request from the Company to delete the data and stop the.
Violations and that the Company requested the contractor Job Function Email List to stop the unlawful processing of personal data The Plaintiff, refraining from disclosing them to third parties or using them in any other way and permanently deleting the file containing this data from all storage media. Moreover, the Defendant Company indicated that the violation of the protection of the by making them available on a single occasion to an unauthorized person.
Does not constitute a gross violation of the provisions of the contract concluded with the Complainant, and therefore does not constitute grounds for terminating the contract immediately or by agreement of the parties. The courts position. Determination of infringement The District Court stated that the disclosure of the Plaintiffs personal data by the Defendant Company to an unauthorized person MS is a violation of personal data protection within the meaning of Art.
Violations and that the Company requested the contractor Job Function Email List to stop the unlawful processing of personal data The Plaintiff, refraining from disclosing them to third parties or using them in any other way and permanently deleting the file containing this data from all storage media. Moreover, the Defendant Company indicated that the violation of the protection of the by making them available on a single occasion to an unauthorized person.
Does not constitute a gross violation of the provisions of the contract concluded with the Complainant, and therefore does not constitute grounds for terminating the contract immediately or by agreement of the parties. The courts position. Determination of infringement The District Court stated that the disclosure of the Plaintiffs personal data by the Defendant Company to an unauthorized person MS is a violation of personal data protection within the meaning of Art.